Wednesday, 24 June 2015

PRICELESS Roman MOSIACS in Turkey botched on restoration


Restoration work on a series of Roman mosaics in Turkey dating from the 2nd century to the 6th century has gone horribly wrong thanks to a botched repair job at the Hatay Archaeological Museum in the southern city of Antakya.

. “Valuable pieces from the Roman period have been ruined, they have become caricatures of their former selves.”

Before and after photos taken by Daskapan show the extent of the damage. Some of the mosaic stones have been replaced with stones of different shapes and colors. Consequently, the facial expressions now appear awry and skewed.

At least ten artworks in the country’s second largest mosaic museum were affected.

Following the emergence of the scandal the Turkish Culture Ministry suspended all restoration work at the museum, and Mustafa Bozdemir, deputy director of the Culture Ministry’s Heritage and Museums department, announced an investigation into the damage.

Meanwhile, Daskapan expressed concern over the extent of the scandal “The new museum currently exhibits around 65 percent of its inventory,” he said, fearing that valuable panels in the museum’s storage may also have been affected.

https://news.artnet.com/in-brief/botched-repair-roman-mosaics-turkey-294514?utm_campaign=artnetnews&utm_source=050615daily&utm_medium=
For more details please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com

HIARIOUS! GEYSER ART in Iceland becomes a world wide problem


The Danish-Chilean artist Marco Evaristti was arrested in Iceland after local landowners accused him of vandalism for dyeing the Strokkur geyser pink.

WOW, THERE’S A LOT OF VANDALISM, POURING RED FOOD COLORING INTO  212+ DEGREE HOT WATER, NOT EASY, I’VE BEEN THERE
.

The artist poured red fruit-based food coloring into the famous hot springs located 70 miles northeast of Reykjavik, causing the geyser to erupt in plumes of bright pink water and steam.

BOTH OF THESE ARGUMENTS ARE ABSURD

Speaking on behalf of the local landowners, Garðar Eiríks­son said “This is not art. I am deeply sorry that a visitor to our country comes up with such an idea. I have very few words to describe my disgust at these actions.”

HE PAINTS DIRECTLY ON NATURE?  HOW ARROGANT CAN HE BE?  DO YOU GET WHY MOTHER EARTH IS SO PISSED OFF?  OOPS I THINK WE ARE GETTING BACK TO TEH JAPANESES’ PROBLEM WITH RUNNING A HEALTHY PORN MEGALOPOLIS BUT BEING HORRIFED ABOUT A JAPANESE WOMAN CLAIMING SHE HAS CONTROL OVER HER VAGINA, IN THE NAME OF ART.

“Nature belongs to no one,” Evaristti insisted. “I do what I do because I’m a painter, a landscape painter who doesn’t use a canvas, I paint directly on nature.”

“I believe in freedom of speech and I believe nature doesn’t belong to certain people, but to everyone,” he argued, adding, “I love mother nature. If I love a woman I give her a diamond ring. That’s why I decorate nature, because I love it.

Unfortunately for Evaristti, Icelandic authorities did not agree with his point of view. The stunt landed the Copenhagen-based artist behind bars for two weeks.

The extant of this guy’s artistic talents is running around the world pouring food coloring into natural waters, which, btw could be carcinogenic?  Did ANYone ask whether the red CHEMICALS were on the bad list or not? I can’t wait for the moron who  who’s going to leave a comment, HOW DARE I HAVE AN OPINION ?  because, truthfully, I think Christos and all this ilk of supposed artists are buffoons, getting your tax $ from Government grants, Coloring the water as ART.  IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT, DON’T BOTHER TO COMMENT, THIS WHOLE THING IS BEYOND STUPID.

This is the fifth time the artist has dyed natural waters, having performed a similar installation at a frozen waterfall in Norway last year.

Iceland cut its arts funding in half last year, causing widespread condemnation from the small country’s artistic community.

https://news.artnet.com/in-brief/marco-evaristti-pink-geyser-iceland-292

For more details please visit here

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

NOT HILARIOUS! VERY BAD restorations at Assissi




Fourteenth-century frescoes in the Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi have been damaged by over-ambitious restorations. Experts claim the frescoes have been significantly compromised; segments that have fallen victim to over-enthusiastic work now stand in stark contrast to the untouched areas.

Unique in their range and quality, the murals were created by numerous late medieval painters from the Roman and Tuscan schools, and include Giotto frescoes as well as works by Simone Martini, Pietro Lorenzetti, and possibly Pietro Cavallini. The frescoes are considered instrumental for understanding developments in Italian art history.

The Directorate General for Fine Arts of the Ministry for Cultural Heritage, led by architect Francesco Scoppola, was alarmed that changes have been made at the Basilica of Saint Francis in Assisi, and ordered an inspection.

Bruno Zanardi, a restorer and lecturer at the University of Urbino, Italy, said he noticed considerable changes in the chapel: “I saw the site in 2011, and got the impression it was a good job, executed by someone I thought was a capable and expert restorer. But when I went back to the basilica a couple of months ago with my students, I had a very different impression,” Zanardi said.

Frescoes at one end of the transept in the Chapel of St. Nicholas, where restoration is already concluded, are heavily compromised. A fresco by Giotto depicting the Madonna fainting at the cross has lost its light and shade contrasts and its colors are dulled.

Martini’s figures of saints appear flattened, while some details of the decor have been obliterated. The Virgin Mary at the center of the triptych in the Chapel of St. Nicholas has completely (and allegedly irreversibly) lost its top coat.

However, Sergio Fusetti, lead restorer at the Basilica of Saint Francis in Assisi, claims that the allegations reported in the Italian press are completely unfounded. “The problem doesn’t exist. We carry out regular checks and maintenance, taking off the hard dust that’s been deposited on the frescoes. We have never done anything without the authorization from the superintendency, which is the culture ministry in the territory,” he  said.

Fusetti has overseen the restoration work since 1997, when the basilica was hit during an earthquake. “I was the last restorer there after the earthquake. I risked my life,” he said.

At the end of an assiduous restoration process following the earthquake, art experts were afforded a moment of celebration in 2012 when Giotto’s signature was discovered on one of the frescoes.

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/appalling-restoration-destroys-giotto-frescoes-at-the-basilica-of-saint-francis-in-assisi-261811

For more details please visit here

THE SEX SLUT OF NUREMBERG-for Mother’s Day



The first hint that I had that there were sexual stories in Albrecht Dürer’s prints came from the discovery of the embedded code that I found in the print known called by other art historians The Promenade or the Young Couple Threatened by Death, although we have no actual idea what Dürer called this print.

THE FIRST HIDDEN CODED MESSAGE FOUND



This motif about illicit love was one of the most popular in the Renaissance and often depicted by artists. A bachelor is secretly trysting with a married woman far away from peering eyes. Here’s what one of the German museums, the Staatliche Kunsthalle, in Karlsruhe, Germany says about this type of composition: (http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/d/Dürer/2/13/1/020.html)

“As the gallant gazes at his companion adoringly, he points ahead to the path. The ostrich feather he is wearing in his hat is a sign of his bachelor status. Behind the tree, unnoticed by the lovers, Death is holding up an hourglass. The picture can be interpreted as a moralizing metaphor for the transitoriness of love and sensuality.

[But] The figure of death does not necessarily indicate a warning to lovers, as this was not customary in the fifteenth century..”

DOES DEATH TRIUMPH?

This was a great guess by previous art historians at what this composition meant for 500+ years, not knowing that a coded message was embedded in the neckline.  But when I found the coded message, I knew everyone was wrong about the real meaning of this print.  It wasn’t customary at the time to have a motif of Death warning the “bad” lovers.  People wouldn’t buy this print if they were constantly reminded that their bad behavior would end in death.  Why would anyone spend good money for that?  No, there was a much better message in this print. One that would make everyone want to buy this print.

Let’s take a close look.

The headdress worn by the woman does signify that she is married, and the man’s clothing,

(the cap with ostrich plume, the tights, the cape, and the man’s shoes) was typical of unmarried men.  Thus we definitely have a depiction of a married woman trysting with a bachelor.

This headdress has been clearly identified as a Nuremberg headdress, indicating the woman is from Nuremberg. Everyone who looked at this print would know that.

SCANDAL IN FASHION


Durer’s drawings of a typical Nuremberg woman’s dress vs. a typical woman’s Venetian dress (commonly thought to be a drawing of a prostitute)

The top part of the woman’s dress is Italian in fashion, while the bottom is from Nuremberg.  The City of Nuremberg regulated clothing in every social class and according to Nuremberg law, this dress would have been understood as illegal and scandalous by customers. How did Dürer get away with selling a print of a totally scandalous dress without getting arrested by the government?

It appears that Dürer depicted a clearly illegal dress to draw attention to his embedded message.



What you see is the following letters smaller than the neckline as such:  “ O N,  then a heraldic “rosette”on the left of the diadem (brooch) on the neckline, then on the right of the diadem “O R I C A 9,” spelling the words “o! Norica 9”

NORICA, which is the Latin feminine form of Noricum, means “from Hungary,”  not “from Nuremberg” as previous art historians claimed. Noricum was the ancient Roman name given to the area from which Dürer’s father emigrated.  It thus appears that Dürer was indicating a Hungarian woman caught in illicit love.

The key to the code is the rosette on the left of the diadem, which emblematically indicates Sigismund Stromeyer “zur goldenen Rose (Golden Rose),” a designation of unknown origin attached to one “line” of the Stromeyer families (of which there were three). The Stromeyer family was one of the richest, oldest, and most politically powerful families of the Nuremberg.

THE MEDIEVAL “ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT”

What “if” Albrecht Dürer was selling scandal sheets about the rich and famous?  What if Albrecht Dürer was the forerunner of “People” magazine and “Entertainment Tonight”?
Let’s take a look.

One of the most famous scandals of Nuremberg in this time was the cuckolding of the Patrician Johannes Pirkheimer by Sigismund Stromeyer zur goldenen Rose, with Barbara Löffelholz, of Hungarian descent, Pirkheimer’s betrothed.

FORCED MARRIAGE

While Johannes was out of the country, studying law in Italy, Barbara broke her betrothal to him, and married Sigismund Stromeyer zur goldenen Rose, because Sigismund was a better catch.  Johannes, hearing of this disgrace, hurried back to Nuremberg, sued in the diocesan court presided over by the Bishop of Bamberg for custody of Barbara Löffelholz, and won his case.

He married Barbara on April 19, 1466, where he immediately bore her away to Eichstatt, sixty miles away from Nuremberg. Johannes never allowed her to return to Nuremberg because of the scandal.

MOMMY DEAREST

The Pirkheimer family remained in  Eichstatt, where Barbara bore 6 daughters, dying in childbirth with the seventh child, the only son,Willibald Pirkheimer, whom legend claims to have been Dürer’s best friend as well as an important patron. After his wife’s death, Johannes returned to Nuremberg and joined a monastery. The six daughters all became nuns in Nuremberg.

WHAT A DEAL!

Since the vacant Pirkheimer house, prime real estate near the City Marketplace was a good place for a goldsmith to operate, it was rented by Dürer’s father in 1466-1467. Dürer was, in fact, born in the Pirkheimer House and lived there until age six, when his father was finally able to purchase a homestead for the family.  Thus, Dürer was intimately aware of this scandal and appears to have capitalized on it.


For some reason Albrecht Dürer was really angry at Willibald Pirkheimer to have enshrined his mother as the sex slut of Nuremberg and to take such a risk in doing this!
We will investigate why in future articles

                                     BUY THE BOOK!  CRIMES IN THE ART: THE SECRET CIPHER OF ALBRECHT DÜRER
www.amazon.com/Crimes-Art-Secret-Cipher-Albrecht-ebook/dp/B00FNWKYMO

For more details please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com

Monday, 22 June 2015

HILARIOUS! GERMAN ART AND FORGERY-GIACOMETTI


Giacommeti’s Walking Man

A court case has been brought against a German ring who stand accused of knowingly attempting to put a forged Alberto Giacometti’s sculpture on the market.

A 67-year-old assessor named Wolf G., and a 60-year-old art dealer named Hans K., have been accused of fraud and falsification of documents. Wolf. G’s ex-wife Ulrike G., a 63-year-old lawyer and her 92-year-old mother have been accused as accomplices.

According to court documents Wolf. G acquired a fake Giacometti sculpture in 2008 in a barter deal with a man identified as Lothar Se., who was a member of criminal gang surrounding the Dutch Giacometti forger Robert Driessen.

Driessen and his gang are estimated to have made €8 million ($8.9 million) selling forgeries until they were apprehended in 2011. Police discovered over 1,000 bronze Giacometti forgeries in the gang’s warehouse. The authorities melted down the sculptures, but as the current court case shows, many are still on the market.

In March 2009 Wolf G. unsuccessfully attempted to consign the fakeWalking Man sculpture to a Swiss auction house, asking CHF 5 million ($5.3 million) for it. A Giacometti expert identified the sculpture as a copy and it was sent back.

Wolf G. and art dealer Hans. K subsequently attempted to sell the sculpture to a private collector for €350,000 ($390,000), but the deal collapsed after the collector was unable to secure a loan.

Several months later the forgery was offered to Sotheby’s, Frankfurt where it was rejected once again.

Following a third unsuccessful sale attempt, Lothar Se. took back the forgery and was arrested after trying to sell the work to an undercover detective for €1.5 million ($1.6 million). The subsequent investigation led detectives to Wolf G., Hans K. and Ulrike G.

The case is already being compared to the German master art forger Wolfgang Beltracchi, who was released from prison in January.

https://news.artnet.com/in-brief/giacometti-forgery-fraud-court-2



For more details please visit here.

What May Be Oldest American Artwork Discovered By Accident In Alaska

Archaeologists have discovered what may well be the oldest artifact ever found in North America. The 12,300 year-old bone pendant was found by accident by experts digging at a site in the Tanana Basin area in Alaska, where they were looking for a group of animal hide tents.

“It made my heart stop when I saw [the pendant],” said Dr. Ben Potter, leader of the excavation project. “Art serves as a way to fix social boundaries. These could be a way to communicate. They could be the first evidence we have for social boundary maintenance in high-latitude North America,” he added.

The cross hatched pendant was found within the outlines of an animal hide tent, which suggests that a group of people used the area as a camp.

The archaeologists found further bone fragments, including a bear jawbone with a canine removed. They believe that the fragments were collected to make other items of jewelry.

Despite being truly ancient, the bone pendant is not the oldest artifact ever discovered. That honor belongs to a staggering 42,000 year-old series of paintings in the Caves of Nerja, near Malaga, Spain.

The Alaskan pendant is the latest in a series of astonishing archaeological discoveries that are changing the way we understand the lives, social customs, and artistic endeavors of ancient civilizations

https://news.artnet.com/in-brief/oldest-american-artwork-alaska-298104

For more details please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com

Friday, 19 June 2015

The SHIPS of MELENCOLIA-Part 4


This ship is located  180 degrees up from the nails that are located on the ground in front of the Melencolia. It is “traveling” in the same direction as the other ships we’ve found so far and is on the right side of the print hidden in Melencolia’s dress, which is indicating the past.

Once again it is a carrack such as we’ve seen before



The red arrow is pointing to the front hull with the distinctive side covering only partially displayed.

The yellow arrow is pointing to the bottom of the ship.

How many more ships will we find? 


For more details please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/