Friday 29 May 2015

What is the Secret of an Apocalypse Art Cycle? Part 1 of the Apocalypse is Coming

“Whenever a man feels the precariousness of his experience, he turns to a picture.” Frances Carey.

Durer albrecht sex four horsemen Nuremberg Rennaisance  Apocalypse


Depicting the story of the last book of the Christian New Testament, called Revelations, but usually referred to as the Apocalypse, and which is the only book of the New Testament completely written in verse, was nothing new in European art from at least 1050 A. D. onwards.  The word “Apokalypsis” is Greek, meaning to unveil or reveal, hence the story being called Revelations. It obviously significantly affected people because it was represented in such a variety of media and contexts over such a long period of time, and that doesn’t happen unless the imagery is very effective. Art historians call the representation of the Book of Revelations in art an Apocalypse art cycle.

What happens in the Apocalypse story?  St. John of Patmos is tortured in boiling oil, and failing to die from this torture is banished to the island of Patmos in the Aegean Sea.  Here he experiences visions and revelations (Greek: apokalypsis meaning to reveal, uncover) which he commits to paper and these writings were included in the Christian Bible, when the books that make up the New Testament were canonized.

The continuity of Apocalypse imagery from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance is striking. The familiarity of the Apocalypse images was why it was so powerful, because the symbolism was so easily recognizable; with the Apocalypse, the symbolism was critical to deliver the message, like company logos and branding today.  It was so important that the images used in an Apocalypse art cycle were recognizable, artists tended to copy previous visual traditions, so there was really not a lot of innovation on the artist’s part in these representations until Albrecht Dürer published his version.

 Michelangelo's Last Judgment


This was how the Church restricted knowledge and controlled the peoples of Europe.   Until the printing press became really commercially viable circa 1470, almost no artist deviated much from what had gone before in the symbols used.  For example, Hell in art always had to be on the left and Paradise on the right, with Purgatory rarely represented. Virtues and Vices were always represented as women, because the Latin language is “gendered” into male or female nouns and all the names of the Vices and Virtues in Latin are female nouns.  To represent God as eternal and timeless, omnipotent, and all knowing, artists represented God with a full frontal face and this is exactly how God is represented in the Apocalypse art cycle.  It was basically an unwritten artistic “rule” to do so until the Renaissance. Because of this “understanding” of what this symbol language meant, Dürer’s self portrait painting of himself in 1500 with a full frontal face is considered outrageous for its time (Dürer most likely hid that portrait in his home).

 The 1500 Self Portrait


The first reason Albrecht Dürer became famous for his 1498 Apocalypse publications was that the imagery was so radically different from what had come before.

Most people think the Book of Revelations, supposedly written by St. John the Evangelist of Patmos, who probably was a fictitious figure, is a pure Christian concept.  Modern scholarship suggests that John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, and John of Patmos refer to three separate individuals. Certain lines of evidence suggest that John of Patmos wrote only Revelation, not the Gospel of John nor the Epistles of John. The author of Revelation identifies himself as “John” several times, but the author of the Gospel of John never identifies himself directly. While both works liken Jesus to a lamb, they consistently use different words for lamb when referring to him—the Gospel uses amnos, Revelation uses arnion. Lastly, the Gospel is written in nearly flawless Greek, but Revelation contains grammatical errors and stylistic abnormalities which indicate its author may not have been as familiar with the Greek language as the Gospel’s author.

 Revelations ancient manuscript


Almost all biblical scholars acknowledge that most of the story is a rewrite taken from the Hebrew Bible, with 348 indirect reworded quotes from the Hebrew bible, especially from the Books of Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel and Psalms. So what are regularly considered clearly and only Christian symbols in the Apocalypse art cycle are often also Jewish symbols as well.  The Church just never told anyone this. Why would they?

Studying political history enlightens us that the Apocalyptic art cycle imagery was a vehicle of political propaganda and satire, quickly exploited by those in power when they wanted to scare the peasantry and merchant class. The Apocalypse was often used during the Reformation (Dürer’s Apocalypse was published almost two decades before Martin Luther and had no connection to the Reformation). The Apocalypse art could always be used to invoke a threat of retribution against the populaces.  If this was effective, then the imagery could then be used as a message of hope that all would be well when the political and economic changes in society were implemented.

Finally, most of the Apocalypse art cycles before Dürer usually had a lot of images.  On average, they included anywhere from 56-164 images. Albrecht Dürer’s Apocalypse had only had 15 images and a title page.  And this was exceptionally strange and Albrecth Dürer’s Apocalypse was like no other.

More to come.


BUY THE BOOK!  CRIMES IN THE ART: THE SECRET CIPHER OF ALBRECHT DÜRER


For more about this topic, please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/.

The Secrets of Christies Auction Results-Astounding Dürer Art Prices

Since I had previously brought to your attention the fact that one of the largest Durer auctions was occurring at Christies on Jan 29, 2013, I thought I would publish some of the results, for some of the prices really blew me away.
This auction realized over $6 million in sales.  Not all of the prints sold .  Here are a few highlights of some of the surprises:

BUY THE BOOK!  CRIMES IN THE ART: THE SECRET CIPHER OF ALBRECHT DÜRER
www.amazon.com/Crimes-Art-Secret-Cipher-Albrecht-ebook/dp/B00FNWKYMO

The ill-assorted Couple (B. 93; M., Holl. 77; S.M.S. 3)

This is a relatively rare image
The ill-assorted Couple (B. 93; M., Holl. 77; S.M.S. 3)
Price Realized
    $50,000
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Estimate $30,000 – $50,00
Lot Description
Albrecht Dürer
The ill-assorted Couple
(B. 93; M., Holl. 77; S.M.S. 3)
engraving, circa 1495, without watermark, a fine, dark Meder I a-b impression, printing with touches of burr and with wiping marks in the sky and elsewhere, with thread margins, trimmed to or on the platemark in places, the tip of the lower right corner made up, generally in good condition
P. 5 13/16 x 5 3/8 in. (148 x 137 mm.)
S. 5 7/8 x 5 3/8 in. (149 x 137 mm.)

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, from: The Apocalypse (B. 64; M., Holl. 167; S.M.S. 115)

NOT EVEN A WORMHOLE DETERRED THIS BUYER!

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, from: The Apocalypse (B. 64; M., Holl. 167; S.M.S. 115)

Price Realized

    $290,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium.
Estimate
    $120,000 – $180,000
The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, from: The Apocalypse
(B. 64; M., Holl. 167; S.M.S. 115)
woodcut, circa 1497-98, watermark Imperial Orb (M. 53), a brilliant Meder b proof impression before the German and Latin text editions of 1498, printing with great contrasts and clarity, much relief showing verso, with 10-27 mm. margins, with the usual horizontal drying crease mostly visible verso, a small wormhole in the lower cloud at right, otherwise in excellent condition
B. 15¼ x 11 1/16 in. (388 x 280 mm.)
S. 16 7/8 x 12 in. (428 x 305 mm.)

The Bathhouse (B. 128; M., Holl. 266; S.M.S. 107)

Apparently someone has been reading my book and this website!  Paper splits didn’t even matter.

The Bathhouse (B. 128; M., Holl. 266; S.M.S. 107)

Price Realized

    $182,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Estimate
    $100,000 – $150,000
The Bathhouse
(B. 128; M., Holl. 266; S.M.S. 107)
woodcut, circa 1496-97, watermark Imperial Orb (M. 53), a very fine, rare lifetime impression, Meder b, with small margins, a short repaired paper split at centre right into the neck of the drinking man, with some associated pale staining, generally in very good condition
B. 15 3/8 x 11 1/16 in. (390 x 282 mm.)
S. 15½ x 11¼ in. (393 x 286 mm.)

Four naked Women (B. 75; M., Holl. 69; S.M.S. 17)

And I haven’t even started writing about the secrets in this print

Four naked Women (B. 75; M., Holl. 69; S.M.S. 17)  
$80,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    $30,000 – $50,000
Four naked Women
(B. 75; M., Holl. 69; S.M.S. 17)
engraving, 1497, without watermark, a fine, early impression, probably Meder a, printing with burr and tone in the sphere and elsewhere, trimmed inside the platemark but retaining a fillet of blank paper in places outside the borderline, a few tiny nicks at the sheet edges, otherwise in good condition
S. 7 3/8 x 5¼ in. (187 x 133 mm.)

The Dream of the Doctor (B. 76; M., Holl. 70; S.M.S. 18)

But I did write about the meaning of this print, which used to be a rather obscure ignored print at auction. No longer.  This may be a world record now.  People are listening

The Dream of the Doctor (B. 76; M., Holl. 70; S.M.S. 18)

Price Realized

    $206,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    $80,000 – $120,000
The Dream of the Doctor
(B. 76; M., Holl. 70; S.M.S. 18)
engraving, circa 1498, without watermark, a very fine, rich and black Meder a-b impression, with burr in the darkest areas, printing with very faint wiping marks below, trimmed inside the platemark on three sides but retaining a fillet of blank paper outside the borderline, trimmed on or just inside the platemark above, in excellent condition
S. 7 3/8 x 4 5/8 in. (187 x 118 mm.)

Coat of Arms with a Skull (B. 101; M., Holl. 98; S.M.S. 37)

Another surprise. This print has always been famous, I wonder what the buyer would think knowing it’s about syphilis

Coat of Arms with a Skull (B. 101; M., Holl. 98; S.M.S. 37)

Price Realized

    $338,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    $250,000 – $350,000
Coat of Arms with a Skull
(B. 101; M., Holl. 98; S.M.S. 37)
engraving, 1503, without watermark, a magnificent, early Meder a impression, printing with sparkling contrasts and utmost clarity and subtlety, with touches of burr in the scrollwork and elsewhere, trimmed to or just inside the platemark but retaining a fillet of blank paper outside the borderline on all sides, in excellent condition
S. 8 7/8 x 6 5/16 in. (225 x 160 mm.)

Adam and Eve (B., M,. Holl. 1; S.M.S. 39)

Never a surprise what Adam and Eva sells for.  If they only knew it’s real meaning.

Adam and Eve (B., M,. Holl. 1; S.M.S. 39)

Price Realized $662,500

  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    $300,000 – $500,000
(B., M,. Holl. 1; S.M.S. 39)
engraving, 1504, watermark Bull’s Head (M. 62), a very fine Meder IIa impression, printing very clearly and with good contrasts, trimmed on or just inside the platemark but retaining a fillet of blank paper on all sides, a horizontal crease, partially split at Adam’s right thigh but mostly visible verso, otherwise in very good condition
S. 9 15/16 x 7 11/16 in. (252 x 195 mm.)

Saint Eustace (B. 57; M., Holl. 60; S.M.S. 32)

This may have been a world record.

Saint Eustace (B. 57; M., Holl. 60; S.M.S. 32)

Price Realized

    $722,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Saint Eustace
(B. 57; M., Holl. 60; S.M.S. 32)
engraving, circa 1501, watermark High Crown (M. 20), a superb, early Meder b impression, very rich and black, yet printing with astonishing clarity, with burr in the trees and elsewhere, with thread margins on three sides, trimmed on or just within the platemark below but retaining a fillet of blank paper outside the subject, laid down along the edges onto an 18th century album sheet, a small surface abrasion on the muzzle of the second dog from the right, generally in very good, original condition
P. 14 x 10¼ in. (357 x 260 mm.)
S. 14 1/8 x 10 15/16 in. (358 x 262 mm.)

 Melencolia I (B. 74; M., Holl. 75; S.M.S. 71)

Without a watermark even!

Melencolia I (B. 74; M., Holl. 75; S.M.S. 71)

Price Realized

    $530,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Estimate
    $400,000 – $600,000
 Melencolia I
(B. 74; M., Holl. 75; S.M.S. 71)
engraving, 1514, without watermark, a very fine, rich Meder IIa impression, printing very darkly in the shadows, on a large sheet with wide margins, with inky plate edges in places, with a horizontal central crease, mostly visible in the margins and verso, some pale scattered foxing in the margins, in excellent condition
P. 9 3/8 x 7 7/16 in. (239 x 189 mm.)
S. 13 3/8 x 10 5/8 in. (341 x 270 mm.)

Saint Jerome in his Study (B. 60; M., Holl. 59; S.M.S. 70)

Close to the world record.  Check out the secret of the lion.

Saint Jerome in his Study (B. 60; M., Holl. 59; S.M.S. 70)

Price Realized

    $362,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Estimate
    $300,000 – $500,000
Saint Jerome in his Study
(B. 60; M., Holl. 59; S.M.S. 70)
engraving, 1514, without watermark, a very fine, bright Meder a impression, printing with remarkable clarity, with margins, in excellent condition
P. 9 13/16 x 7½ in. (249 x 190 mm.)
S. 10 3/8 x 7 7/8 in. (264 x 200 mm.)

The Rhinoceros (B. 136; M., Holl. 241; S.M.S. 241)

THIS IS THE ONE THAT BLEW MY MIND!   I believe this is a world record.

Durer made this print as a souvenir print about this sensational creature that was brought to Europe, equivalent to freak images published in the National Enquirer.  He had done the same with the Monstrous Pig of Landser in 1496. Alas, the rhino drowned when the ship carrying it sank.

The Rhinoceros (B. 136; M., Holl. 241; S.M.S. 241)

Price Realized

    $866,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium .
Estimate
    $100,000 – $150,000
The Rhinoceros
(B. 136; M., Holl. 241; S.M.S. 241)
woodcut with letterpress text, 1515, watermark Anchor in Circle (M. 171), a very good impression of this rare and important woodcut, first edition (of eight), with the complete letterpress text above, with thread margins or trimmed to the borderline at left and right, trimmed just inside the borderline below and to the text above, a small abrasion in the monogram, otherwise in good condition

Saint Anthony reading (B. 58; M., Holl. 51; S.M.S. 87)

One of Durer’s Hungarian Trophies.

Saint Anthony reading (B. 58; M., Holl. 51; S.M.S. 87)

Price Realized

    $386,500
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium
Estimate
    $100,000 – $150,000
  Saint Anthony reading
(B. 58; M., Holl. 51; S.M.S. 87)
engraving, 1519, without watermark, a superb Meder a impression, with narrow margins, in excellent condition
P. 3 7/8 x 5 5/8 in. (99 x 143 mm.)
S. 4 3/8 x 5¾ in. (111 x 146 mm.)

For more about this topic, please go through http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/.

The Secret of Dürer’s Penis Revealed

Cipyright Dr. Elizabeth Garner All Rights Reserved

Text copyright © Jan 23, 2013 Dr. Elizabeth A. Garner, All Rights Reserved

 Secrets on Durer Penis Revealed

Let’s get real and talk about Dürer’s penis for it is a very important penis indeed.  Notice his penis above, the scrotum and the penis and testicles seem to be tied off in some unusual way. If anyone knows the meaning of this activity, please contact me.

So now let’s look at the incredible pornographic print Dürer published in 1498:

 The Great Satyr

 Sex penis Durer Albrecht Nuremberg Renaissance

In his Dairy of the Netherlands Journey, Dürer made only one entry about a print he called Herculum: Aug 20, 1520 at Antwerp “ I also gave the Factor of Portugal a “Herculum.”  Scholars have assumed this composition is the Herculum referenced in the Diary because of its complexity, refusing to consider that the artist more likely referred to his intricate 1495 woodcut which he had actually titled Ercules (Hercules) in the woodblock. The imagery in this image has no logical association with the myth of the classical hero.

The satyr in the lower left of the composition is a mythological creature that is half man and half goat. The satyr grips a jawbone of an ass, lower left, a symbol for the biblical figure of Samson.  Old Testament scholars consider the jawbone of the ass to represent the most powerful weapon of the Bible, as wielded by Samson [Judges 15:16 “with the jawbone of an ass (or donkey) I have smitten 1000 men”]. Dürer seems to indicate, therefore, that the most powerful figure in this composition is the satyr. We will see this jawbone again in the Sea Monster, where it again appears to signify the person with power.

My extraordinary discovery of a circumsized encoded penis on the satyr indicates that Dürer meant to give some sort of Jewish message in this print, since circumcision was only practiced among Jews. This satyr must therefore be interpreted as “Jewish” in some way. The code on the penis is “OllO,” which has yet to be deciphered, and has similarities to symbols found in the encoded belt in Melencolia (See Melencolia I below).

The body of the naked woman next to the satyr on the left is not an original Dürer concept.  It is traced from a print titled the Battle of the Sea Gods, by Italian fifteenth-century artist Andrea Mantegna.  During his stay in Venice in 1494-1495, Dürer traced almost all of the famous Mantegna’s works available to him, using another image from the Battle of the Sea Gods in the woodcut print he titled Hercules. The veil held by the woman can be read as a symbol of St. Agnes.

The headdress on the standing, central woman is also found in Dürer’s 1497 engraving titled by scholars as the Four Naked Women or Four Witches.  I believe that this headdress signifies Dürer’s mother, Barbara.

The rooster helmet worn by the naked man is also found in Dürer’s woodcut called The Beast with Two Horns, part of The Apocalypse.  A rooster was used in the arms of the Nuremberg Patrician Rummel family.  Dürer’s wife, Agnes Frey, was descended from a Rummel family member, and Dürer’s own family had already been intermarried with the Rummels before his marriage to Agnes.

Until the encoded Jewish penis is deciphered we will never know what this composition is really depicting. The Jewish “Azazel” was a goat that bore the sins of all the Jews on the Jewish Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur. The goat was pushed off a cliff during ancient times and is the source of the concept of “scapegoat.” It is my opinion that Dürer, as a hidden Jew, was identifying himself with the satyr, indicating that he was scapegoat, albeit a powerful one, and that the print references a family feud between the Dürers and his in-laws, the Frey/Rummels.
 
BUY THE BOOK!  CRIMES IN THE ART: THE SECRET CIPHER OF ALBRECHT DÜRER


To know more about this topic please click here.

Now on Kindle – Crimes in the Art: The Secret Cipher of Albrecht Durer:How the Great Hoax Began

Crimes in the Art: The Secret Cipher of Albrecht Durer

Listed as #8 on Amazon Hot New Releases and Best Sellers in Renaissance Category!

The Secret Cipher of Albrecht Durer on Kindle


http://www.amazon.com/Great-Hoax-Began-Crimes-ebook/dp/B00AZNX8CO/ref=zg_bsnr_1090_8

Enjoy!

For more details please visit here.

The Secrets of What are Albrecht Dürer Prints Worth?

Albrecht Durer: Masterpieces from a Private Collection
  • Sale 2778
  • New York, Rockefeller Plaza
  • 29 January 2013
This private collection of 61 lots represents the one of the finest selection of prints by Albrecht Dürer to appear at auction for many years. Meticulously assembled over the course of almost half a century by a connoisseur with an unparalleled eye for quality, this auction features Dürer’s masterworks, including Adam and Eve and Melencolia I. Estimates start at $3000.

Sale Location

  • Christie’s Saleroom
    20 Rockefeller Plaza, New York
See Map >

Auction Times

  • Jan 29, 2:00pm, Lots 1-62

Viewing Times

  • New York, Rockefeller Center
  • Jan 22, 10am – 5pm
  • Jan 23, 10am – 5pm
  • Jan 24, 10am – 5pm
  • Jan 25, 10am – 5pm
  • Jan 26, 10am – 5pm
  • Jan 27, 1pm – 5pm
  • Jan 28, 10am – 5pm

Contact Info

I am constantly asked whether ordinary people can buy Albrecht Dürer prints, what would they cost to purchase and what are they worth.  I always urge novice collectors to find a reputable print dealer who can educate them about the print market first.

But for those who are more savvy, usually the best way to acquire any print is at auction.

Christies Auction House is having one of the most significant sales of a private collection of Dürer  prints which will take place in New York City, Rockefeller Plaza on Jan 29, 2013.

Normally, I would not be giving any auction house free publicity but this is one of the most significant Dürer auctions to have occurred since 2007.  I bring this to your attention because the quality of most of these prints are superba dn the provenances (the chain of who owned what print when) is very distinguished.

As such, the estimated prices for these Dürer prints are extremely high but not unusual for this quality and I think gives a great lesson to all interested in how the auction markets work.

You can follow along on this auction by creating an account at Christies, which is free, and then registering to track the Dürer prints as they sell, which is what I plan to do.  Don’t be surprised if you see the prints selling for almost twice their auction estimate, that is a common occurrence.

CAUTION: Ignore the silly descriptions that are attached to each print as to their meaning.  They are the result of “specialists” regurgitating all the old information and mistakes and errors that have been perpetuated for 500 years.   It’s part of the game of selling auction items.  It is obvious that none of these employees has bothered to even follow the my exhibitions or read anything on this website which totally contradicts the secrets that are being revealed here.

Truth doesn’t seem to be part of their research forte.

Here’s the link to the Christies catalogue:

http://www.christies.com/sales/albrecht-durer-newyork-january-2013/

You will be able to open up an electronic catalogue and look at every print, enlarge the images, read the provenances and see the huge sums of money for which these prints are expected to sell.

Enjoy!

For more info about this page, please go through http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/.

Thursday 28 May 2015

The Secret of How the Great Hoax Began

THE NEW MEISTER AT WORK


The New Meister

The life of Albrecht Dürer got even stranger when he returned to Nuremberg and started conducting business in the summer of 1495.  He was given a 200 gulden dowry to buy a house but he didn’t buy a house until 1509.  Instead, as was the usual custom, the bride and groom moved in with the father-in-law.  But Albrecht and Agnes didn’t even have to do this, because Hans Frey owned two houses at the City Market square, so Albrecht and Agnes by themselves were able to move into a house with a fully furnished print shop on the first floor, equivalent to setting up shop on Fifth Avenue in New York City. Nothing could be better.

The incredibly strange thing about this period in Albrecht’s life is that he didn’t hire any apprentices, which is what Meisters did.  He was working alone. In fact, there is no evidence that Dürer has any apprentice before 1501, when one of the most powerful men in all of the Holy Roman Empire, the Elector Friedrich, Duke of Saxony, who became Dürer’s patron in 1496, sent his bastard son to Dürer’s workshop as his first apprentice. No one has ever questioned why Dürer was working alone for over 6 years.

 Roman Empire - The Elector Friedrich
The first oil painting Dürer does as a Meister is a painting of St. Jerome in the Wilderness, believed to be dated to 1495, which you see here:

 St.Jerome oil painting
St. Jerome kneels as a penitent. In his right hand he holds the Bible, which he translated into Latin, and in his left hand the stone which he is using to beat his breast. His eyes stare upwards, beyond the small crucifix stuck into the tree trunk. Wearing a blue gown, his red mantle and cardinal’s hat lie beside him on the ground. Behind is his faithful lion, befriended after he had removed a thorn from its paw. In the background is a landscape with dramatic rock formations, probably based on sketches that Dürer had made of the quarries near Nuremberg. The scene is lit by a dramatic evening sky. The reverse of the panel depicts an apocalyptic celestial phenomenon, a red star-like light and a streaking golden disc. Many times, it would be found that Dürer had another painting on the back of his oil images, and always these added paintings had Jewish themes.

Although some scholars have considered it to be an eclipse or meteor, it is usually considered a comet. Dürer’s image is probably derived from woodcuts of comets published in the Nuremberg Chronicle of 1493. A similar object to the one painted by Dürer appears in the sky of his engraving of Melencolia I, made 20 years later. This small panel was only recognized as a Dürer in 1956 by art historian David Carritt, so no historian was even studying a Dürer oil paintings from 1495. We have no idea who would have commissioned this painting or what they paid the new Meister.

Let’s look at what he was producing for sale in 1495-1496 that would be supporting himself and his wife. In the early part of his career, from 1495 until late 1500, Dürer was an artist of only regional importance, whose market was primarily the south-central Bavarian German cities of Nuremberg, his birthplace, Regensberg, Augsburg, and Frankfurt, so we have to keep this customer base in mind as we analyze what really occurred.

 The Men's Bath Painting by Albrecht Durer
The man on the left leaning on the wooden post is hypothesized to be Michael Wolgemut, Dürer’s Master, with whom he apprenticed, although Wolgemut was not known to sport a beard; men were clean-shaven in Nuremberg, except for Dürer, who was chided often for wearing a beard in the fashion of his Hungarian ancestors.  There is no mistaking the homoerotic overtones of the longing gaze of this figure.

Notice the not so subtle homosexual clues that Dürer included.  The first is the obvious “cock” spigot coming out of the wooden post on the left.  Lucas Paümgartner, foreground right, is holding a flower. Wolgemut, leaning on the post is gazing longingly at Dürer.  Most of the poses of the figures are very sexually suggestive.

The inscrutable clues, though, are right in the center of the print on the Dürer figure.  It is the distinctive knot in the string of Dürer’s codpiece. Dürer uses this knot in other images also as clues. And an almost imperceptible half circle peeking out from under the cap of Lucas Paumgartner on the right.

But what we must explore is the outrageousness of the entire image and that it was sold at all with impunity.  Whoever the unidentified figures are, everyone in Nuremberg would have recognized them as members of the power elite families in their g-strings.  This wasn’t some version of Greek art.  This WAS the sale of the naked famous sons of Nuremberg with their obvious agreement.

Even worse, this print would have been sold at the market fairs by Dürer’s wife Agnes or his mother Barbara.  Imagine what it would have been for either of those women having to peddle pictures of their naked son/husband cavorting with his naked rich buddies in homoerotic poses, and having to look all buyers in the eye as they sold this print, knowing the buyer recognized everyone in the print?   How could this not be a humiliation for their families?   How could this not be a best seller?  How could they keep any of these prints in stock?

And why was there no punishment for anyone involved?  These arrogant sons of the ruling class were guaranteed their spot in the government no matter how much humiliation they heaped on their families by appearing in this image. They had nothing to lose.

Since Dürer suffered no punishment from this action, but instead ended up with many painting commissions from these elite, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the Nuremberg ruling families was protecting Albrecht Dürer more so than anyone has ever realized. And that the Dürer family was part of this power elite society.

In other words, Albrecht Dürer’s fame and fortune was planned and steered by the media moguls, his godfather and father-in-law, and protected by his government. Dürer didn’t become a rock star because of his artistic talent. Albrecht Dürer became a rock star because he was a “product,” a contrived Nuremberg brand.

How could anything go wrong?

For more about this topic please go through http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/.

The Secrets of The Beginning of the Great Hoax – Part 3

FAME AND FORTUNE-THE EARLY WORKSHOP YEARS WHAT IS ART AND WHAT IS AN ARTIST?

The most crucial point to understand about Albrecht Durer’s works was that art in medieval and Renaissance times was not “art” as we know it today.  Paintings commissioned by the Church were for propaganda and “educational” purposes (e.g. keeping the populace in terror of Hell), not for the glorification of the artist’s talent.  Artists weren’t even allowed to sign their Church commissioned works. The paintings commissioned by wealthy patrons were for the purpose of self-glorification; their portraits or commissions were a demonstration of their political power and wealth.  The differences in artistic talent were only a means to an end.

WHO WAS CENSORING AND CONTROLLING INFORMATION?

 Anton Koberger
There were two major censors of information during Dürer’s life, the Catholic Church and the Nuremberg City Council.

The Catholic Church was the official censor of the Holy Roman Empire and the Vatican attempted to control all information, both scientific and artistic, throughout the realm. The Church quickly realized the potential of the printing press as a challenge to its influence. Censorship was introduced into the print shop in 1487, when Pope Innocent VIII required that Church authorities approve all books before publication. The Church had censored books for centuries, though it became much more difficult to do so after the invention of printing. Controlling a dozen painfully copied manuscripts of a forbidden text may have been a manageable task before 1450, but controlling the thousands of copies churning off the presses every year was quite another matter. Bibles and books about the lives of saints were the most abundant types of books printed.  But even in this medium the official sanctions of the Church were widely ignored.

In addition to the Church’s censorship, the Nuremberg City Council, the ruling governmental body of the City of Nuremberg, was also an extremely powerful censor.  To maintain a tight rein over its citizens, the City Council regulated almost every aspect of life, and was specifically concerned with slanderous documents or any information that would cause unrest among the populace or war.  The City Council in particular was extremely concerned with the publication of maps, as the Council believed maps were military intelligence, providing enemies with information about the defenses of the City that was highly secret.  But the torrent of information that was unleashed by Gutenberg’s printing press could not be restrained.  Especially, when there was money to be made by Nuremberg merchants in papermaking, printing, and bookbinding.
 
WHAT LANGUAGES WERE USED TO PRINT BOOKS?

One of these forbidden texts was the Bible printed in any other language than Latin.  The Church required that the bibles and the lives of the saints were printed in Latin, and Latin was the international language of the realm, like English is the de facto language of the world today. If a volume was published in Latin in any one particular country, it was easy to sell it in another country, despite what the native language was. But printing in the local language made reading available to people who did not know Latin, including many women. Moreover, spelling started to become standardized. Local languages were strengthened, and translations became common, leading to a decline in the use of Latin, apart from in the Church and universities. Koberger realized there was an untapped market of readers who could not read Latin or found it more difficult to read in Latin.

 Anton Koberger's German Bible
The profit motive was much stronger than the Pope.  Koberger started publishing bibles in German as early as 1479, against the Pope’s prohibition, and was wildly successful.  The stranglehold against information was broken and the pattern to success was laid bare.  Print in the language of the people and sales would rocket.

HOW DID PAPER GET PASSED ON?

Gutenberg’s printing technology quickly spread from Mainz to Subiaco in Italy (1465), Paris (1470), and London (1476). By the beginning of the 16th century, there were approximately 240 printing shops in Europe, and Anton Koberger, Dürer’s godfather, controlled 24 commercial presses, employed 100 men and was the most powerful publisher in the Holy Roman Empire.  Hans Frey, Dürer’s father-in-law was the second biggest printer in Nuremberg.  These two men controlled much of the information from Nuremberg and what was circulated in the Germanic part of the Holy Roman Empire.  It is estimated that only 30,000 books existed before Gutenberg brought his press to market in 1450.   By 1500, only fifty years later, 20 million book volumes had been published in the world, equivalent to the same phenomena with smartphones today. Such an explosion of technology indicated that there was much more literacy among the European peoples than is generally recognized.

What is not often recognized is that bound books as we know them were not sold as such.  Books were sold as loose leaves to the customer, who then had to take these pages to the bookbinder of their choice to have them bound into a book.  This way the customer could have their choice of book cover and add their own bookplates if desired. To own a book was a great social achievement and to own many attested to the owner’s high social status.

Paper prints also became a means of implementing public health measures.  Often, the Imperial Free Cities of the Empire printed public health broadsides to circulate in the cities.  Dürer was engaged to create one such broadside when the scourge of syphilis hit Nuremberg in 1496, a picture of which you see here. It was a cheap method of social control


Syphilitic Man by Albrecht Durer

But every mom and pop could own a press, and much surreptitious printing was occurring. Artists were printing artistic images for sale.  Because paper was such a mobile medium, it was passed on constantly, be it image or text.  Everything that could be printed, was printed, and became mobile, spread by travelers riding on carts of straw.  Printed paper became the first tsunami waves of an information superhighway which the censors could not stem.

WAYS PAPER GOT PASSED ON

Trade was the lifeblood of the Holy Roman Empire and most merchants and people who were not farmers were very mobile. Although there were always shooting matches and festivals occurring in cities, the outlets for paper print sales were primarily the medieval city fairs, huge trade markets that occurred usually three times a year in each Imperial city, coinciding with Easter, summer, and the Christmas season. This is the source of the print fair schedules today.

Publishers and artists employed sales agents to peddle their book leaves.  Dürer employed a sales agent as early as 1497 with little stock to sell, a very strange occurrence in his early career, but most of the time had his mother and wife and possibly sisters peddle his wares in Nuremberg and Frankfurt at the city markets.  Pilgrims traipsed through the empire on their way to the Holy Land.  Knights were errant everywhere passing information on with paper.

However, people were not free to travel on any road they wanted.  Travel was highly regulated by a system of toll roads in every country, which required lots of travel paperwork and tariffs and taxes and planning to get from one place to another.  Those who were passing subversive messages to others needed to take this into account.  Information became funneled through these proscribed channels of movement.

ILLUSTRATIONS, A PICTURE WAS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS

But more than words and text, people clamored for pictures.  They wanted images to look at of any kind.  Humans are visual creatures, the brain desires image more so than written language.  Artists could become rock stars in society now that there was a way for images to be passed on.  Artists no longer needed to beg from patrons or be tied to a patronage system, they just needed to be marketers.  They needed to know what their market segments wanted as pictures, they needed to understand human nature.

Artists were now in control.  The godfather, Anton Koberger, had seen the future, and trained his godson well.  Dürer was poised and positioned politically to grab fame and fortune with artistic images.  Both Dürer’s father-in-law and his godfather had huge publishing operations, whose resources were available to Dürer, especially typeface and lead fonts for printing text on the back of images. Dürer was a socially and economically engineered dynamo, the Steve Jobs of his time. Why would such a politically connected rock star start passing secret messages in his prints before he had fame and fortune?

HOW DID ARTISTS MAKE MONEY FROM GRAPHIC PRINTS IN THE RENAISSANCE?

 Medival German Printing Press

Printing was a new technology in the Renaissance.  Gutenberg did not bring the first commercially viable printing press to the market until 1450, and it took twenty more years before the advantages of the printing press was recognized and exploited. By the late 1470’s goldsmiths that had become publishers, like Dürer’s godfather, Anton Koberger, became media moguls. Koberger was the Rupert Murdoch of his day.

Nothing has changed.  For example, look at how many photos and pictures each of us takes and posts on Facebook, and that’s just one forum. A picture was worth a thousand words. By the end of the 1400’s the printing press freed artists from this yoke and artists could become speculative entrepeneurs.

WHY DID PRINTING BECOME SO UNIVERSAL?

The printing press was the personal computer of the medieval age.  Most people have no idea why the printing press became so important in history. What was so special about the printing press? NO FIRE WAS USED.
The printing press did not require fire to operate and that made all the difference in the world.  Fire was so dangerous in any medieval city, its use was highly regulated at all times.  In Nuremberg all occupations that involved fire had to operate outside, and this was not uncommon in most of the rest of Europe. Fire killed, and fire had to be controlled.

This meant that most occupations could not operate in winter, because it was too cold and too hard to keep fire going, and the firewood was needed to heat homes. The winter hours were short (7 hours of daylight) and not much could be done. Winter was indeed the time of most people’s discontent.  And for the authorities, winter made things very difficult because idle people caused trouble.

But the printing press required no fire.  It could be operated year round, in summer hours and during the dark nights of winter.  It was basically portable and almost anyone could afford one.  Any mom and pop business could buy a press and run a sideline business, making money publishing whatever anyone wanted to say if they paid.  The first internet was born.

Artists could buy a press and make whatever images they thought the market would pay for.  Artists could finally become rich.  Albrecht Dürer was determined to do so.

MULTIPLES

The beauty of the printing press was replication.  Unlike an oil painting, which was a single image created once that could only be viewed in one place (a church, a palace, City Hall), a graphic print image was created once and printed tens, or hundreds, or thousands of times. They could be sold at the city market fairs to the teeming populaces that came through each city at different seasons, such as pilgrims, traveling salesmen and wandering knights, and these city market fairs were held three times a year in each important city (there were 70 “Free” Cities in Germany at the time that had market fairs).  A printmaker and print dealers had enormous new markets and customer bases.  All they had to do was find themes and images the people wanted to buy.

HOW MUCH DID A PRINT IMAGE COST?

We are brainwashed today to think of prints as “art,” and therefore we assume it is the complexity of an image or the skill of the artist that caused medieval people to part with their money. While it is true that people perhaps would pay more for talented artists such as Dürer, buyers weren’t rushing out to buy Dürer’s latest and greatest every year, such as what happens at art fairs today like Art Basel Miami or Frieze in London.

The cost of a medieval print was based on the size of the paper the customer bought, and whether the image was printed from a woodblock or copperplate (it cost more to make copperplate engravings and so they sold at premium). Paper sizes were either “quarter sheets,” half sheets,” or “whole sheets,” and it was whole sheets that were cut up, making half sheets or quarter sheets. Prices were always negotiable depending upon the city.  Dürer found he could sell the same print for different prices in different cities at different times of the year.

Despite the fact that there were many monies in use in Europe at the time, and it was bankers and moneylenders who established the worth of each (arbitrage), we have Dürer’s own information about what he sold his prints for. The money system Dürer used was the gulden, also known as the florin, both of which are denoted as Fl.

Dürer sold woodblock prints for ¼ Fl, engravings for ½ Fl. and full sheet engravings normally would sell for 1 Fl.  He had published 5 picture “books” (The Apocalypse, the Life of the Virgin, The Small Passion, The Large Passion, and the Engraved Passion) and these would sell on average for ½ Fl, regardless of how many pictures were in the book.  The Small Passion had 37 pictures, the Apocalypse and the Large Passion had only 16 pictures, but they still sold for the same price.

To put this in perspective, a coat made of rabbit fur only cost ½ Fl, and Dürer was giving tips to porters of less than ¼ Fl, so he priced his prints relatively cheaply.  Dürer was counting on the secrets in his art to make him rich and volume selling.  A lot like internet marketing today.

In the next article, we will explore what the new Meister was really doing in his workshop.

To know more about this page, please click here.

The Secrets of Dracula, Dragons and Durer

BUY THE BOOK!  CRIMES IN THE ART: THE SECRET CIPHER OF ALBRECHT DÜRER

 


www.amazon.com/Crimes-Art-Secret-Cipher-Albrecht-ebook/dp/B00FNWKYMO

The Knights Templar were the most famous of the medieval military knight orders connected with the Crusades, whose sudden  and violent disappearance continues to fascinate millions of people. Since the 18th century, Freemasonry incorporated Templar symbolism into their rituals, and their legends and secrets have been connected to the Holy Grail and the Ark of the Covenant.  Popular novels such as The Da Vinci Code, The Lost Symbol, and Foucault’s Pendulum, modern movies as National Treasure and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and video games such as the Assassin’s Creed and Broken Sword have added fictional embellishments to the Templar story. Every day we can watch some TV show or YouTube video that features the history of the Templars, speculating what happened to them.

About one hundred years after the destruction of the Templars, another knight order eclipsed the fame of the Templars and became all powerful in Europe. This knighthood group was called the Order of the Dragon (Societas Draconistrarum in Latin, lit. “Society of the Dragon”).

The order was founded in 1408 by Sigismund, King of Hungary (who was born in Nuremberg), later the Holy Roman Emperor, and was organized like the military orders of the Crusades, especially to fight the Ottoman Turks who continually threatened Eastern Europe. The Order of the Dragon flourished during the 15th century, especially in Germany, Italy and Eastern Europe.  In Hungary, the birthplace of Albrecht Dürer’s father, only nobility (from barons upwards) and magnates were allowed to join this order.  The Order of the Dragon still exists and many of Europe’s current royalty belong to it.

The symbol of the order was the dragon as you see here:

 Order of the dragon
Vlad Dracul III the Impaler, commonly known as Dracula, Prince of Wallachia (then part of the Kingdom of Hungary) was a member of the Order of the Dragon, and the name Dracula, which means “little dragon,” is derived from his membership in the Order of the Dragon.  Vlad’s father was initiated into the Order of the Dragon in Nuremberg, Albrecht Dürer’s birthplace, and Vlad III was initiated into the order in Nuremberg at age 5.  From this we can be surmise that medieval Nurembergers were very familiar with the Order of the Dragon and would recognize the order’s insignia.

So what is the connection between this knight order and Albrecht Dürer’s art? Let’s take a look.

Albrecht Dürer’s father, known as Albrecht the Elder, emigrated to the Imperial City of Nuremberg from Atjós, Hungary (now Oradea in Romania), thus we know for sure that Dürer was ethnically at least half Hungarian.  Atjós, which means “door” in Hungarian, was translated to “Dürer,” which means door in German, and adopted as the family’s surname.


Painting of Mother Barbara


 Albrecht The Elder
Little is recorded about the life of Albrecht the Elder.  The first time he appears in any historical record is 1444 in Nuremberg, where his name is found on a military roster.  We do know that he had to have some extremely good political connections, because upon his marriage to his wife Barbara, he was made a Master goldsmith, and was made the official Assayer and Weigher of Silver and Gold, an extremely prestigious and powerful position in Nuremberg society.

When Albrecht the Elder finally aquired his own home in 1475, he purchased in the neighborhood of some of Nuremberg’s most powerful and richest families, who called themselves the Patricians.  The Dürer family was living among the highest society of Nuremberg, who did not allow just anyone to be their neighbors.

Albrecht the Elder was also appointed to other important city positions and by the 1480’s was a shareholder investor in the mine at Goldkronach, owned by the Burggrafen of Nuremberg (the city’s “monarch”) and the Markgrafen of Ansbach-Kulmbach.  Later he partnered as shareholder with other Patricians in other mining companies. In a society as class stratified as Nuremberg, Albrecht Dürer the Elder could never have come from humble Hungarian roots as the current myth asks us to believe.

In other words, Dürer’s father was one of the “1%” of Nuremberg society and probably one of  the top 5% richest people in the Holy Roman Empire.  Albrecht Dürer was not “a poor boy that made good.”

In 1490, Albrecht painted his mother and father’s marriage coat of arms on the back of the portrait he did of his father before he left Nuremberg for his journeymanship training, which you see here:

 marriage coat of arms painting
Dürer knew that no one would have ever see the back of this painting during his lifetime or his parent’s lifetime, so he could paint truthful information about his family here. If we take a look at the upper left corner of the Dürer marriage coat of arms, there is a large figure of a dragon, although it is difficult to see because the painting was damaged.  How do we know it’s a dragon?

 st george
It does not have horns. In medieval art, one of the differences between a dragon and a devil was the use of horns on the figure. Dragons were portrayed as serpent-like scaly creatures that rarely flied despite having wings.  Devils in art derived from early Pre-Christian goat figures, which is why devils have horns in art.

Thus, Albrecht is telling us in this painting that his family has some connection with a dragon. Could it be the Hungarian Order of the Dragon?  Could Dürer be telling us his ancestry is nobility?

Why is this distinction important?  Because the animal symbols in the following Dürer compositions have been misidentified as devils and are really dragons, and thus the current interpretations as to their meaning are wrong.  Let’s take another look:

 The Four Witches
This Dürer print is currently titled the Four Witches. The animal in the lower left of this print has been interpreted as a devil and thus scholars believe the four naked women are witches.  However, when this print was made in 1497, witches in medieval art and printing were not portrayed naked. Since symbolism in medieval art (called iconography) had to be instantly recognizable by the buying customers, it would be nonsensical to believe that these are witches, for no one in the society would interpret them as such. It wasn’t until late in the Renaissance that naked witches appeared in art or prints. Actually, one of Dürer’s famous apprentices, Hans Baldung Grien, was one of the first artists who illustrated naked witches.

So if these women are not witches, who are they?  And why are they associated with a dragon? Could they be connected with the Hungarian Order of the Dragon?

Yes. The clues that tell us this is are  the letters on the ball suspended over their head and the veil on the woman on the left. There is a relationship of these women to each other, to Dürer, to Hungary, and to a dragon.

Let’s look at another at another image:

 The Temptation of the idler
I have previously published here how the Dürer Cipher unravels the meaning of this image. The figures are Dürer’s Hungarian relatives, his uncle Ladislas (Larwence), his aunt Katherine and his cousin, their son, Niklas, who apprenticed as goldsmith along with Albrecht under the tutelage of Albrecht the Elder.

The animal flying in the air putting a bellows into the man’s ear has also been identified as a devil.  But once again it does not have horns and therefore it’s a dragon.  Recognizing this animal as a dragon is a further clue to decoding the true meaning of this print. In Hungary, the Dürer family would have been members of the Order of the Dragon and Dürer tells us that they were members often in other prints.

However, the Patricians, who came from non-noble ancestry, had great enmity towards nobility.  To be economically successful, the Dürers would have had to suppress the knowledge of their linkage to this knight order.  Yet, Albrecht would not let this connection be forgotten. This membership in the order apparently was of great importance to him which is probably why he keeps reminding us of this connection in his prints.

It goes a long way to explain why  Dürer wrote in 1506 in his letter from Venice to Willibald Pirkheimer “Oh, how I shall freeze after this sunshine! Here I am a gentlemen, at home only a cockroach.” (Heaton, The Life of Albrecht Dürer of Nürnberg, 98.)

For more details please click here.

The Secrets of The Beginning of the Great Hoax – Part 2

WHERE DID DURER GO FOR HIS JOURNEYMANSHIP?

We actually have almost no information as to where Albrecht Durer went for his four years of journeymanship (known as the Wanderjarhe-the wandering years) that is totally reliable.  There’s no information in Durer’s own handwriting and bits and pieces have been pieced together from the writings of others, all of which could have been embellished. What follows is the best conclusion from sparse evidence. Durer left Nuremberg in April 1490, right after Easter.

Based upon other’s writings, Durer headed towards Cologne, where his cousin Niklas Durer was working as a goldsmith and then headed to try to get employment with the famous artist Martin Schongauer in Colmar. Unfortunately, by the time Durer had reached Schongauer’s workshop, Schongauer had died.  Schongauer’s brothers were extremely hospitable to Durer under the circumstances.

Durer next traveled to Basle (now  in Switzerland) in 1492 to visit Schongauer’s goldsmith brother Georg. Apparently, Durer was working in Basle at the time, probably for a colleague and subcontractor of his Godfather by the name of Johann Amersbach. Then came a astounding discovery in the 20th century.

 A woodblock of St. Jerome in his Cell surfaced with Albrecht Durer’s name carved on the back of the block and dated 1492.
woodblock cutter, and journeymen were not allowed to autograph their work by law, a woodblock of St. Jerome in his Cell surfaced with Albrecht Durer’s name carved on the back of the block and dated 1492.  This is a very suspicious fact that indicates Durer was probably getting some very special attention from powerful authorities.

This print was manufactured as the frontispiece for a book about St. Jerome’s letters, published in Basle in 1492, five days after Columbus sailed on his first voyage, so we can place Durer in Basle during the summer of 1492.  Durer had almost full artistic control over this composition and what he designed foreshadows Durer’s secrets because the print showed St. Jerome reading in three languages: Latin, Greek, and Hebrew.

The next evidence of Durer’s whereabouts comes from his 1493 self-portrait

 The 1493 self potrait of Albrecht Durer

This self-portrait has an inscription written in a Strassburg, Germany dialect that says:

Myj sach die gat

Als es oben schtat.

Roughly translated as: My affairs follow the course allotted to them on high. It is assumed that Durer was in Strassbourg when he painted this self-portrait because of this inscription.

Suddenly, Albrecht Durer was recalled from his journeymanship by his father in 1494 to marry Agnes Frey, the eldest daughter of Hans Frey, the second biggest publisher in Nuremberg after the Godfather, Anton Koberger.

 The drawing of the bride, Agnes Frey which Albrecht labels

And then suspicously, without working for anyone, Albrecht Durer was immediately made a Meister within a month’s time of his marriage!  Who was bought off?

THE 1494 JOURNEY TO VENICE.

The plot thickens dramatically once Durer marries Agnes on July 7, 1494 and is made a Meister.  By custom, the couple would have moved into a house owned by the father-in-law, Hans Frey, and Frey owned two very large houses at prime retail locations at the City Hall Square.  Albrecht and Agnes moved into a house with a fully equipped print shop, a rather fortuitous situation for the newly married artist.

And then Bubonic Plague hit Nuremberg with a vengeance in mid August of 1494.  By mid September, the plague wave was so bad that 118 people died in one day. By the time it was over 9,780 victims had been buried in mass graves from a city population of around 20,000. Many of the rich and powerful of Nuremberg fled the city to their summer mansions far outside of Nuremberg to survive.  But for some strange reason, Albrecht Durer flees the plague in August 1494 and heads for Venice, something no Northern German artist had done before.

According to drawings Durer made on this trip, he ended up at Agnes’ cousin’s estate in what is now a part of Switzerland and then continued onto Venice to supposedly study with the Italian Masters to learn their secrets.  What is suspicious  is  we have no idea where Agnes or the Durer Family (the father, mother, and livings siblings (originally 18) were during this time period. There’s no data about either of these important wealthy families.

It is doubtful that the Freys and the Durers would have remained in Nuremberg during this horrendous Plague wave, and very suspicious that we know where many of Nuremberg’s rich and powerful had gone to survive but nothing about the Durer Family or the Freys.  What we do know is that the father, Albrecht the Elder, and the mother Barbara, a sister Margret, a few other siblings, and all the Freys did survive this scourge since we know their death dates occurred much later in time but no one will speculate where they were.  It’s very possible they all went to Venice and much more likely.

DURER IN VENICE

 Arco Mountain painting made by Albrecht Durer

Once Durer left Nuremberg in August 1494, it probably would have taken him at least 2-4 weeks to get to Venice, so he probably made it to Venice by end of September. A well-dated work shows that the fleeing artist first headed to Innsbruck, where he sketched the Emperor Maximilian’s residence. Afterwards, he rode over the Brenner Pass. Roughly a dozen watercolor  drawings remain from this journey. He visited a total of five locations: Trent, Klausen, the castles of Arco and Segonzano, and the Eisack Valley. He was moving precisely along the border between the southern tip of Germania and Italy.

His father-in-law, Hans Frey, had a number of businesses Frey operated from Venice, and all the German merchants were forced to function from what was known as the German Compound, the Fondaccio de Tedeschi (which means the Compound of the Frogs in Italian), so Durer would have much support from his countrymen when he reached Venice.

But what is really strange is that Italy was at war during 1494 and 1495 when Durer fled to Venice, which is bizarre.  Charles VIII, the Dauphin, the heir to the French Throne, had invaded northwestern Italy in the spring of 1494 so anyone fleeing the Nuremberg plague would have known this.

 Italy when Charles VIII invaded in 1494
Charles trampled over the Italians and marched down the coast of Italy, invading Naples by March of 1495. The Republic of Milan, which bordered the Republic of Venice, had sided with Charles VIII. Charles was pitted against the Vatican, the Holy Roman Emperor, and Spain, a world war.

Durer and anyone who went with him would have been greatly affected by this war during the entire period he was in Venice.

THE NEWEST THEORY: FAKER PAR EXCELLENCE


A German museum curator  Herr Eser has a new theory published in 2012 that Durer never went to Venice at all. He says that Dürer was, at most, a “man who cautiously approached the border” during his journey. “Driven by his own limitedness,” he wanted to give the impression that he was a widely-traveled man. Eser theorizes that Durer cunningly gave his watercolors names like “Italian Castle” or “Venetian Outpost,” and thus Dürer cheated his way into a country that he had actually barely set foot in.[1] I differ dramatically with this theory because of the secrets Durer left us in his prints.

SO DID DURER GO TO VENICE OR NOT?

According to most art historians, Durer the Meister studied with the renowned painters Giovanni Bellini

 Renowed Painter Giovanni Bellini

who’s brother-in-law was the famous painter and engraver, Andrea Mantegna.

 Andrea Mantegna's Bacchanal engraving
Durer traced every one of Mantegna’s engravings and based his famous 1494 Death of Orpheus drawing on Mantegna’s work.

 The 1494 Death of Orpheus made in Venice

DID DURER GO TO VENICE?

The proof lies in this print:

 
For one of his most treasured secrets about Venice is encoded in this print. See my previous article SEX Sells!

For more details please visit at http://www.albrechtdurerblog.com/.